Tsigilis, N., & Theodosiou, A. Varied forms of persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated.
I think this activity is important for my improvement.8. McAuley‚ E.‚ Duncan‚ T.‚ & Tammen‚ V. V. (1987). Subjects (N = 116) competed in a basketball free-throw shooting game, following wh … There is also the 25-item version that was used in the internalization study, including the three subscales of value/usefulness, interest/enjoyment, and perceived choice. Egoinvolvements‚ self-presentation styles‚ reactance‚ and other psychological dynamics must be considered. Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally-controlling styles. While doing this activity I felt like I had a choice.24. Then, there are four specific versions of the IMI that have been used in past studies. I really did not have a choice about doing this activity.11.
I didn't really have a choice about doing the task.12. Scoring information is presented after the questionnaire itself.For each of the following statements‚ please indicate how true it is for you‚ using the following scale:1. While I was doing this activity‚ I was thinking about how much I enjoyed it.4. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Plant, R. W. (1990). The The IMI consists of varied numbers of items from these subscales, all of which have been shown to be factor analytically coherent and stable across a variety of tasks, conditions, and settings. Items within the subscales overlap considerably, although randomizing their presentation makes this less salient to most participants. Recently, a seventh subscale has been added to tap the experiences of relatedness, although the validity of this subscale has yet to be established. I felt like I was enjoying the activity while I was doing it.13.
In fact, we concluded that to be confident in one’s assessment of intrinsic motivation, one needs to find that the free-choice behavior and the self-reports of interest/enjoyment are significantly correlated.Another issue is that of redundancy.
Ryan‚ R. M. (1982). This approach has been adopted by thousands of scientists worldwide. (R)I believe I had some choice about doing this activity.I felt like it was not my own choice to do this task.
Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Second‚ there is a short 9-item version concerned with the activity of reading some text material; it has three subscales: interest/enjoyment‚ perceived competence‚ and pressure/tension.
Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Nonetheless‚ we recommend that investigators perform their own factor analyses on new data sets. First, there is a standard, 22-item version that has been used in several studies, with four subscales: interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, perceived choice, and pressure/tension. Test–retest reliability and validity of the C‐IMI was assessed. For example‚ in a study by Ryan‚ Koestner‚ and Deci (1991)‚ we found that when participants were ego involved‚ the engaged in pressured persistence during a free choice period and this behavior did not correlate with the self-reports of interest/enjoyment. I believe I had some choice about doing this activity.3.
While I was interacting with this person‚ I was thinking about how much I enjoyed it.3. The general criteria for inclusion of items on subscales have been a factor loading of at least 0.6 on the appropriate subscale, and no cross loadings above 0.4. Nonetheless, we recommend that investigators perform their own factor analyses on new data sets. I believe doing this activity could be somewhat beneficial for me.21. First‚ the full 45 items that make up the 7 subscales are shown‚ along with information on constructing your own IMI and scoring it.
First, the full 45 items that make up the 7 subscales are shown, along with information on constructing your own IMI and scoring it. Finally, there is a 29-item version of the interpersonal relatedness questionnaire that has five subscales: relatedness, interest/enjoyment, perceived choice, pressure/tension, and effort.Finally, McAuley, Duncan, and Tammen (1989) did a study to examine the validity of the IMI and found strong support for its validity. Still‚ it is very important to recognize that multiple item subscales consistently outperform single items for obvious reasons‚ and they have better external validity.On The Scale page‚ there are five sections.
Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Thus‚ for example‚ an item such as I tried very hard to do well at this activity can be changed to ÒI tried very hard to do well on these puzzles or ...in learning this material without effecting its reliability or validity. Second, there is a short 9-item version concerned with the activity of reading some text material; it has three subscales: interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, and pressure/tension. Like other self-report measures, there is always the need to appropriately interpret how and why participants report as they do. While I was working on the task I was thinking about how much I enjoyed it.2. I tried very hard while interacting with this person.21. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.
I am satisfied with my performance at this task.15. I would be willing to do this activity again because it has some value for me.The following sentences describe thoughts and feelings you may have had regarding the other person who participated in the experiment with you. The instrument assesses participants’ interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, effort, value/usefulness, felt pressure and tension, and perceived choice while performing a given activity, thus yielding six subscale scores.